Today's news from CDCR are provoking a sigh and a head shake, as we've already discussed, ad nauseam, the ridiculous love affair the parole authorities have with Operation Boo here and here. Doesn't the Division of Adult Operations grow tired of this festival of spook? Is no one critical of the fact that there have been ZERO recorded incidents of molestation during trick-or-treating?
My only comment for this year's gloomy shaming ritual is this: Sex offenders are the only population who I believe will not benefit from the cost argument. Their lobbying power is, well, nil, and the fact that these baseless operations go on year after year are an indication that the public wants to continue believing that they are all, uniformly, monsters to be monitored and controlled in the face of no evidence whatsoever. We can turn around several important punitive trend, but it'll be a long time before we reassess the devastation our excessive policies toward a population with extremely low recidivism rates has wreaked on released inmates and their families.
Thoughts and News on Criminal Justice and Correctional Policy in California
Monday, October 31, 2011
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Let's Build Us Some Jailz!
Prison officials open up $600 million for jail construction to 25 counties
State officials have invited 25 counties to apply for a total of $602 million to construct new jail beds, after narrowing the list in recent days.The bond funding, available under a 2007 law known as AB900, will be awarded by March and will allow a number of counties to expand their jail capacity. It comes as the state implements “realignment” the governor’s plan to address overcrowding in state prisons by letting thousands of low-level offenders serve their time in local jails instead of state prison. Advocates for prisoners oppose the release of funds.
The counties given the green light to apply for the funds are: Los Angeles, Riverside, Orange, Sacramento, Santa Clara, Fresno, Stanislaus, Tulare, Monterey, Yolo, Sonoma, Placer, Kings, Shasta, Sutter, Madera, Imperial, Napa, Siskiyou and Tuolumne. Additonally, Kern, San Joaquin, Santa Barbara, Amador and San Benito counties are being asked whether they would like to forgo earlier AB900 funds awarded to them and instead reapply for this round of bond money.
Leslie Heller, an official with the Correction Standards Authority, said the majority of the state’s 58 counties expressed interest in the money, and that the counties invited to apply were chosen solely on the increased number of prisoners they are expected to be housing under realignment.
“We knew with realignment there would be a lot of interest, and we know there is not enough money to go around to all the counties, so we thought, ‘Let’s find out how many are interested, then pick an appropriate number from that to go through the application process, so they don’t expend their resources unnecessarily’,” she said.
She added that there is “absolutely not” enough money for all 26 counties, and that some may not ultimately choose to submit an application.
For more information on AB900 funding, visit this website.
Today at Hastings: Realignment Panel
Today, UC Hastings will host a panel about the realignment. The panel is free and open to the public. Details:
When: 10/27/2011, 5:30 PM to 7:30 PM
Where: 200 McAllister, Alumni Reception Center (2nd floor)
Who:
Moderated by UC Hastings Professor Kate Bloch.
Panel and Q&A to be followed by a wine reception. Please RSVP to HCLS@uchastings.edu.
When: 10/27/2011, 5:30 PM to 7:30 PM
Where: 200 McAllister, Alumni Reception Center (2nd floor)
Who:
- Chief Presiding Judge Lisa Novak—San Mateo County
- Deputy District Attorney Jeff Rubin—Alameda County
- Assistant Public Defender Don Landis—Monterey County
- Executive Director of Death Penalty Focus Jeanne Woodford
Moderated by UC Hastings Professor Kate Bloch.
Panel and Q&A to be followed by a wine reception. Please RSVP to HCLS@uchastings.edu.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Today at Hastings: San Francisco District Attorney Debate
UC Hastings will be holding a free, open to the public event today, which might help some of our readers make up their minds regarding their voting choices on Nov. 8. We'll be hosting four of the five candidates for San Francisco District Attorney: Sharmin Bock, Bill Fazio, David Onek and Vu Trinh. The event will be moderated by my colleague Rory Little, and live streamed through the event listing.
Start: 10/26/2011 from 3:30 PM to 5:00 PM
Location: 200 McAllister, Alumni Reception Center
See you there!
Start: 10/26/2011 from 3:30 PM to 5:00 PM
Location: 200 McAllister, Alumni Reception Center
See you there!
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
KALW Show on Realignment Podcast
Yesterday I spoke on KALW with Keramet Reiter and the Chronicle's Marisa Lagos about the realignment. Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi and Director of Probation David Muhammad called in, and it was, all in all, a literate and informative discussion. A full podcast of the show can be found on the City Visions website or by opening this file.
Monday, October 24, 2011
Jail expansion: Counties seek millions from state
Check out today's SF Chronicle cover story, "Jail expansion: Counties seek millions from state," and especially its ending:
Lenard Vare, director of Napa County's Department of Corrections, said he agrees with advocates that incarceration isn't the only answer. But the rural county also anticipates an increase of at least 70 inmates per year - and its jail is already over capacity.
"The old adage 'If you build it, they will come' is true, because law enforcement in general - police officers - come with the mind-set to fight crime, and arresting people is one of the ways to fight crime," he said. "Unless we decide to simultaneously work on our overall criminal justice system ... we are not going to make a difference. Locking someone up 50 times does not deter them from committing crimes, because it becomes a way of life."
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Realignment Starts Monday
A great story by the Chron's Marisa Lagos explains the realignment. The piece is a must-read in its entirety and I highly recommend it. I want to highlight one pierce people may not have been attentive to: The important role probation officers will play.
Realignment is not just a numbers game. Under the new law, counties have been given new legal tools meant to help them get at the root issues that lead to criminal behavior.
Most of those tools consist of increased flexibility for judges, prosecutors and probation officers in deciding how to punish a person.
For example, in the past, if a drug offender failed to meet the terms of his probation, the only real option a probation officer had was to send him back to court, where a judge would consider whether to ship him back to prison or jail - a long, ambiguous process that resulted in delayed punishment.
But research shows that open-ended, uncertain punishments do not encourage criminals to change their behavior. What does, according to experts, are swift and certain sanctions - such as a tactic known as "flash incarceration," in which an offender is jailed for a day or two almost immediately after violating the terms of their probation.
Under realignment, a probation officer could make this decision without sending the person back to court. And, the probation officer can tailor the punishment to an offender's work schedule, so they don't lose their job.
Judges will also now be allowed to mandate a split sentence - combining jail time with at-home detention, drug abuse treatment or parenting classes, for example.
Marisa Lagos, Keramet Reiter, and I will participate in an hour-long conversation about the California correctional crisis on KALW tomorrow at 7pm. Tune in, call in with your questions, and join the conversation.
Realignment is not just a numbers game. Under the new law, counties have been given new legal tools meant to help them get at the root issues that lead to criminal behavior.
Most of those tools consist of increased flexibility for judges, prosecutors and probation officers in deciding how to punish a person.
For example, in the past, if a drug offender failed to meet the terms of his probation, the only real option a probation officer had was to send him back to court, where a judge would consider whether to ship him back to prison or jail - a long, ambiguous process that resulted in delayed punishment.
But research shows that open-ended, uncertain punishments do not encourage criminals to change their behavior. What does, according to experts, are swift and certain sanctions - such as a tactic known as "flash incarceration," in which an offender is jailed for a day or two almost immediately after violating the terms of their probation.
Under realignment, a probation officer could make this decision without sending the person back to court. And, the probation officer can tailor the punishment to an offender's work schedule, so they don't lose their job.
Judges will also now be allowed to mandate a split sentence - combining jail time with at-home detention, drug abuse treatment or parenting classes, for example.
Marisa Lagos, Keramet Reiter, and I will participate in an hour-long conversation about the California correctional crisis on KALW tomorrow at 7pm. Tune in, call in with your questions, and join the conversation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



