tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8107037609455779557.post2554005156283682730..comments2024-02-28T05:56:28.293-08:00Comments on California Correctional Crisis: New Death Penalty Procedures RejectedHadar Aviramhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15200780666976305749noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8107037609455779557.post-33476017211487929272010-06-15T22:53:19.142-07:002010-06-15T22:53:19.142-07:00California Department of Corrections e-mailed me a...California Department of Corrections e-mailed me a copy of the Death Penalty Proposal that was rejected. In the very first paragraph: 3349--Method of Execution, I found two typographical errors. Second, the paragraph was over-crowded with information that should not have been included in the "Method of Execution". Third, the Form number 1801-B (Rev. 06/10) also had two typographical errors: But what is most interesting the wording is like the mentality of a six year old. As a result, I argue that if one is mentally limited in their understanding, the person does not need to be executed because they are not mentally capable of understanding the reasoning behind being executed.<br />Above all, I am still trying to figure out why ordinary citizens are executed for the murder of ordinary citizens...but then perhaps I do not understand executions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com